• Home
  • »
  • Career Couch
  • Home
  • Executive Jobs
  • Features
    • Focus
    • Career Couch
    • Radar
    • Water Cooler
    • Insight
    • Podcasts
  • Place an executive ad

Just get to the point

By Jim Bright | smh.com.au | 05 December
Email to a friend
Print
Increased Text
Decreased Text

A waffly and unfocused career objective won't get you an interview, writes Jim Bright.

James from Concord wrote to me asking for some pointers to help him apply for roles in sports journalism.

He wrote: "I could imagine that you would get thousands of these a year." Well, James is correct and, sadly, if I do not feature my response in this column, the alternatives are either engaging a professional to review your documents - people often recoil when I quote the cost of this - or they can search out good-quality publications on the topic.

At the risk of naked self-promotion, I will mention that Joanne Earl and I have written an evidence-based resume guide called Resumes That Get Shortlisted, which is published by Allen & Unwin. It costs a lot less than seeking professional advice and is a good alternative for the budget-conscious.

To be fair and balanced, Dr Ann Villiers' How to Write and Talk to Selection Criteria (fourth edition) is an excellent Australian resource, especially for those going for public service roles. I have addressed many aspects of the written application in recent weeks, so I am going to limit my response to James to the issue of the career objective.

Career objective statements are pithy declarations that appear at the beginning of a resume to orient the recruiter to the applicant's needs.

Wrong. Did I really just type that? Well, that is the common view of what the career objective is and that is a mistake.

Career objectives, in my view, are a valuable opportunity for the applicant to demonstrate they have done their homework, understand the demands and opportunities related to the role and show they are a good fit for the position being offered.

Now, that last sentence was a mouthful. It contained three ideas - homework, understanding and candidate fit. It takes some processing and understanding.

James took my breath away with his first sentence. It reads: "To utilise my skills in communication and the experience which I have already to continue to gain experience from news organisations with the aim of leading to a career in journalism covering any number of issues, with a special interest in sport."

Luckily for this breathless reader, that was the sum total of the career objective. All James's ambitions crammed into one overworked sentence. Perhaps James feels a need for brevity and has interpreted that in terms of the number of sentences instead of the number of concepts introduced, or even the number of words.

The brevity comes at the expense of clarity and, in my book, clarity is everything on an application. Secondly, the statement is focused exclusively on James's needs and wants. He alludes to experience without further elaboration. This can be corrected simply with a few additional words.

For instance, "My international experience reporting on the Olympic Games" would suffice and impress. Grammatically, I'd prefer to think experience is not "gained from news organisations" as though it were some sort of commodity, rather "gained working with news organisations".

The phrase "any number of issues" really does need reworking. Perhaps James is seeking to impress with his adaptability and willingness to work on a broad range of assignments. However, in this context and without elaboration, it impresses as either vague or, if I am looking for excuses to reject a candidate, desperate. James seems to have a lot to offer an employer.

Apparently he has graduate qualifications related to journalism and has had international sports journalism experience at a major event. Perhaps James could rework this last paragraph into a career objective that speaks of what he can contribute to an employer, which, coincidentally, is what he wants.

That is the essence of a good career objective.


Jim Bright is professor of career education and development at ACU and a partner at Bright and Associates, a career management consultancy. brightside@jimbright.com For more workplace advice, visit mycareer.com.au/advice.

First published by Smh.com.au on December 05 2009
Visit smh.com.au for the latest news updated throughout the day

More Career Couch news

  • How not to manage staff
  • Switching off
  • Leading questions
  • Closed for inspiration
  • More career couch
  • Home

Career Couch news

  • How not to manage staff
  • Switching off
  • Leading questions
  • Closed for inspiration
  • More career couch

Executive Positions

  • Account Manager
  • Business Analyst
  • Business Development Manager
  • Electrical Engineer
  • Financial Controller
  • General Manager
  • Project Manager
  • Senior Engineer
  • Solutions Architect
  • Tax Manager
  • View complete list of job titles

Focus news

  • OECD warns of double-dip recession
  • Connectivity in your hands
  • How to beat the stress test
  • Are you burnt out?
  • More focus

Podcasts

VV Show #59 - Barry Silbert of SecondMarket
Download the MP3. Any shareholder in a startup can tell you there's a big difference between paper wealth and cash. Short of an IPO or outright acquisition, there are few options to cash out for the shareholders of even the most thriving private companies. Barry Silbert is determined to change that with his company SecondMarket -- an exchange like the NASDAQ for private stock and other illiquid assets. He founded the company in 2004 focused on restricted stock, and quickly reached profitability with only $350,000 in angel funding. The road to this point was not without challenges; Barry's business partner was diagnosed with cancer and passed away as they were establishing the company. In 2008, SecondMarket made $20 million in revenue. Barry's success has not tempered his ambition as he's spent 2009 aggressively moving into new asset classes such as private companies (Facebook stock is already being traded on his platform), limited partner interest in venture capital firms and even California IOUs. Hear how this former bankruptcy banker did it and why he believes "The sky's the limit" for his business.

210: Women Are Over-Mentored (But Under-Sponsored)
Herminia Ibarra, professor of organizational behavior at INSEAD and coauthor of the HBR article "Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women."

More Podcasts
Home | Executive Jobs | Focus | Career Couch | Radar | Water Cooler | Insight | Podcasts | Sitemap | Contact us | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | About us | Place an Executive Ad
Fairfax Digital
NEWS | MYCAREER | DOMAIN | DRIVE | FINANCE | MOBILE | RSVP | TRAVEL | WEATHER
  member centre | login  
Fairfax Digital
  member centre | network map | mobile | advertise with us | place a classified ad  
SMH | THE AGE | BRISBANE TIMES | THE FINANCIAL REVIEW | MYCAREER | DOMAIN | DRIVE | RSVP | FINANCE | FAIRFAX NZ